Selective Beliefs over Preferences∗
نویسنده
چکیده
People tend to believe what they want to believe. In this paper, I examine how people interpret others’ behavior to form beliefs about others’ preferences. I develop a “selective beliefs” model of social preferences in which people have intrinsic preferences over outcomes and also hold prior beliefs about the preferences of others. I propose that people attempt to selectively perceive and interpret others’ behavior such that their posterior beliefs about others’ preferences minimally interfere with their own self-interest. From a general model, I derive two specific models designed for the regression analysis of a semi-transparent simplified ultimatum game experiment, where I assume that the second-mover forms posterior beliefs about first-mover’s preferences over the second-mover’s two possible outcome choices. The inequality aversion model is designed to measure the second-mover’s behavioral response to an available signal indicating that the first-mover has some degree of aversion to inequality. The income concern model measures the second-mover’s behavioral response to an available signal indicating that the first-mover is either concerned or unconcerned about income. ∗I am ever grateful to my thesis adviser, Professor Botond Kőszegi, for his invaluable input and for coolly fielding an extraordinary number of questions on everything from psychology and economics to word-processing. I also thank Professor Roger Craine for his generous advice on the research process.
منابع مشابه
Religious Beliefs and Fertility Preferences among Engaged Couples, Referring to Premarital Counseling Centers of Mashhad, Iran
Background & aim: Considering the lack of information regarding the effects of religion on young couples’ fertility preferences, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between religious beliefs and fertility preferences among engaged couples in Mashhad, Iran, in 2013. Methods:This cross-sectional study was conducted on 450 engaged couples, referring to premarital counseling clinics at h...
متن کاملEvolution and Human Nature
rom an economic perspective on individual decision making, human beings have three key characteristics: preferences, beliefs and rationality. Beliefs are the probabilities with which people think various outcomes will occur, conditional on information that might be available. Preferences are the rankings over the set of gambles that are based on such beliefs over the outcomes. Rationality is th...
متن کاملDecision-Making in the Context of Imprecise Probabilistic Beliefs
Coherent imprecise probabilistic beliefs are modelled as incomplete comparative likelihood relations admitting a multiple-prior representation. Under a structural assumption of Equidivisibility, we provide an axiomatization of such relations and show uniqueness of the representation. In the second part of the paper, we formulate a behaviorally general axiom relating preferences and probabilisti...
متن کاملComputing Preferences Based on Agents' Beliefs
The knowledgebase uncertainty and the argument preferences are considered in this paper. The uncertainty is captured by weighted satisfiability degree, while a preference relation over arguments is derived by the beliefs of an agent.
متن کاملBeliefs and Utility: Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information
Beliefs are a central determinant of behavior. Recent models have assumed that beliefs about or the anticipation of future consumption can have direct utility-consequences. This gives rise to informational preferences, i.e., preferences over the timing and structure of information. Using a novel and purposefully simple set-up, we experimentally test key predictions about preferences for informa...
متن کامل